美国最高法院在本周一（4月22日）同意即使在个人没有申请入境的情况下，按照移民法案受理美国永久居民是否可以“被裁断禁止入境”类型案件。
第十一巡回法院发现，在2018年9月，一名叫做Andre Martello Barton的牙买加公民无法通过取消递解（一种适用于在美国连续居住七年以上的永久居民的救济方式）来消除自己身上的递解令。Barton被裁决为“禁止入境”因没有满足七年的居住期限，其在2018年12月向高院提出复审请求。根据上诉法院对移民法案的解读（此项解读虽被第九巡回法庭驳回，但却被其他三个巡回法庭接纳），Barton于1989年5月入境美国，在1996年1月因被指控刑事犯罪而被认定为“禁止入境”，在此种情况下，根据时间停止法规，他的连续居住日期被打断。
高等法院之前在2018年的“Pereira v. Sessions”案中审核过时间停止法规。在该案中法官裁定，政府召唤移民的移民出庭令，必须包括在时间停止法规下合理有效的听证时间以及地点。
All rights reserved. All content of this blog is the property and copyright of Jia Law Group and may not be reproduced in any format without prior express permission.
Contact marketing@jiaesq.com for more information or to seek permission to reproduce content. This blog is intended for general information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. The reader should consult with knowledgeable legal counsel to determine how applicable laws apply to specific facts and situations. Blog posts are based on the most current information at the time they are written. Since it is possible that the laws or other circumstances may have changed since publication, please call us to discuss any action you may be considering as a result of reading this blog.
By using this blog you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
